domingo, 21 de abril de 2013

Leonard Bloomfield


·         Mentalism and behaviorism have at least three things to be involved: outside speakers, inside speakers and speech.

·         Outside speakers, inside speakers and speech could be discussed as ecological systems, distinct from each other because of the point of view taken an odd result, since the need for a point of view should not arise, and the perennial disputes between rival conceptions would be even more puzzling.

·         Science itself was of an intellectual, logically deductive enterprise.

·         Mentalism was clearly out of step with empirical science defined by Positivists.

·         Speech-behavior is labeled a substitute response to an immediate outside speaker stimulus; inside speaker also is a substitute stimulus for outside speaker responses otherwise occasioned by outside speaker stimuli.

·         Speech is taken to be an objectively observable activity of an organism, a succession of substitute stimuli and responses.

·         Inside speaker was seen as really no more than a spatially isolable part of outside speaker, individually shaped as its own piece of the entire ecology by social conditioning.

·         Language con be seen as the totally of mutually effective substitute responses.

·         Mentalism is dualistic, it recognizes two kinds of data, experience, perception, insight, causality, evidence, explanation, study goals and methods of study.

·         Behaviorims is monistic, it admits only a single kind of data, erroneously distinguished by mentalist into experience, insight, perception, causality.

·         The literary standard is accessible through general or personal educational effort, transcends geographic and social barriers, and is used on occasions described as formal.

·         The colloquial standard is observed in situations lacking formal behaviors among observably privileged classes within a larger speech.

·         The provincial standard is observed among those remote geographically from the formative environments of cultural centers.

·         Phonetics demonstrates that actual sounds lack clear-cut phonetic differences, even when refined discrimination is possible in the laboratory.

·         Contrasts are differences that count, since a pair of languages might have the same phonetic inventory, yet be differently structured.

·         Linguistic form is the situation in which the speaker utters it and the response which it calls forth in the hearer.

·         Borrowing is to provide an objective way of describing linguistic and cultural contact, influence and evaluation.